<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Government Redefinition Could Re-Ignite China-India Border Dispute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2point6billion.com/news/2009/07/24/british-government-redefinition-could-re-ignite-china-india-border-dispute-1599.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2point6billion.com/news/2009/07/24/british-government-redefinition-could-re-ignite-china-india-border-dispute-1599.html</link>
	<description>China &#38; India, 40% of the world&#039;s population</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:54:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ak</title>
		<link>http://www.2point6billion.com/news/2009/07/24/british-government-redefinition-could-re-ignite-china-india-border-dispute-1599.html/comment-page-1#comment-70281</link>
		<dc:creator>ak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2point6billion.com/?p=1599#comment-70281</guid>
		<description>CD-E , its the otherway around. AP with india and AC to china, as crucial to access the turbulant regions of the west. Also, the chinese hv agreed to the mcmohan line in burma as a inter. border way back in the late 50&#039;s.

britain&#039;s role in the world and indeed in s asia has not bn laudatory...this- even as it struggles to be relavant in a fast and dynamic backyard and the world...even individuals find it difficult to let go of illusions of grandure , nations even more so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CD-E , its the otherway around. AP with india and AC to china, as crucial to access the turbulant regions of the west. Also, the chinese hv agreed to the mcmohan line in burma as a inter. border way back in the late 50&#8242;s.</p>
<p>britain&#8217;s role in the world and indeed in s asia has not bn laudatory&#8230;this- even as it struggles to be relavant in a fast and dynamic backyard and the world&#8230;even individuals find it difficult to let go of illusions of grandure , nations even more so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Devonshire-Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.2point6billion.com/news/2009/07/24/british-government-redefinition-could-re-ignite-china-india-border-dispute-1599.html/comment-page-1#comment-70274</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Devonshire-Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2point6billion.com/?p=1599#comment-70274</guid>
		<description>Personally I would agree with that Sandeep, however the Chinese do not see it that way. I did hear unofficially that if India gave Arunachal Pradesh to China, China would relinquish claims on Aksai Chin to the West. Go figure: Arunachal Pradesh is agriculturally fertile, Aksai Chin is high altitude desert. Some deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I would agree with that Sandeep, however the Chinese do not see it that way. I did hear unofficially that if India gave Arunachal Pradesh to China, China would relinquish claims on Aksai Chin to the West. Go figure: Arunachal Pradesh is agriculturally fertile, Aksai Chin is high altitude desert. Some deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.2point6billion.com/news/2009/07/24/british-government-redefinition-could-re-ignite-china-india-border-dispute-1599.html/comment-page-1#comment-70265</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2point6billion.com/?p=1599#comment-70265</guid>
		<description>LOL. Does British govt still think that it has the authority or the capacity to redefine borders after it was kicked out 60+ years ago from the continent? This is a clear case of misconception from the British. As far as Tibet goes: It is being added into China&#039;s empire by force. Chinese are powerful economically as well as military wise. British govt first caved in on Hong Kong and then caved in on Tibet. Arunachal Pradesh is a different story...it is a part of the Indian Union (Tibet was never a part of the Union). Chinese should recalibrate their desire for expansion. It is impossible. And as far as Britain&#039;s records and announcements are concerned: They have absolutely no resonance or value in this context. It was important 100 years ago..not anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. Does British govt still think that it has the authority or the capacity to redefine borders after it was kicked out 60+ years ago from the continent? This is a clear case of misconception from the British. As far as Tibet goes: It is being added into China&#8217;s empire by force. Chinese are powerful economically as well as military wise. British govt first caved in on Hong Kong and then caved in on Tibet. Arunachal Pradesh is a different story&#8230;it is a part of the Indian Union (Tibet was never a part of the Union). Chinese should recalibrate their desire for expansion. It is impossible. And as far as Britain&#8217;s records and announcements are concerned: They have absolutely no resonance or value in this context. It was important 100 years ago..not anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cnheying</title>
		<link>http://www.2point6billion.com/news/2009/07/24/british-government-redefinition-could-re-ignite-china-india-border-dispute-1599.html/comment-page-1#comment-70130</link>
		<dc:creator>cnheying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2point6billion.com/?p=1599#comment-70130</guid>
		<description>wow, GB eventually do a good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, GB eventually do a good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

